Haiti vs Scotland

Group C · Saturday, June 13, 2026, 01:00 UTC · Boston (Foxborough)

Haiti

15% · Elo 1517

0-1

Projected score

Scotland

63% · Elo 1750

The model's read

The model makes Scotland strong favourites at 63%, leaving 15% for Haiti and 21% for the draw. Goals project around 1.0–1.7 (both teams to score 50%, over 2.5 52%). The biggest single factor is Overall strength, favouring Scotland. Confidence sits at 54/100 with moderate upset risk; the underdog has paths to a result.

Auto-updated every hour as ratings, odds and news change.

Match outcome

oracle-v1.0.0

HAI 15%Draw 21%SCO 63%

Haiti win

15.3%

Draw

21.3%

Scotland win

63.3%

Expected goals

1.00 – 1.74

Projected score

0-1

top exact 0-1 · 13.2%

Confidence

54/100

Result lean

Scotland clear edge

Score band

Favorite multi-goal edge

Goal environment

Moderate

If it opens up — high-scoring alternative

1-3 at 5.7% — most likely scoreline with 3+ goals total.

top exact score carries 13.2% probability

Risk & uncertainty

Upset risk

35/100

Data quality

84/100

Uncertainty band

43 – 70%

Most likely scorelines

Top 12 from a Dixon-Coles adjusted Poisson matrix.

01
13.2%
12
9.8%
02
9.8%
11
9.2%
10
8.5%
13
5.7%
03
5.7%
21
5.6%
22
4.9%
00
4.4%
20
3.2%
23
2.8%

Top 12 most likely scorelines. Heat is relative to the most likely outcome. Haiti vs Scotland.

Team comparison

Rating profile across the key dimensions.

Ensemble breakdown

Final probabilities blend the technical model with every available source layer. Persisted 2026-07-11 01:00:59 UTC.

Final (blended) home

15.3%

Final draw

21.3%

Final away

63.3%

Source weights applied

  • technical47.1%
  • learned16.1%
  • market19.3%
  • crowd7.5%
  • external0.0%
  • intel0.0%
  • fundamental7.0%
  • sentimentMomentum3.0%

Source presence

  • technical1 signal
  • learned1 signal
  • market44 signals
  • crowd1 signal
  • externalnot used
  • intelnot used
  • fundamental13 signals

Why this prediction

Coverage 67/100
Conflict 100/100

Source conflict detected — model confidence has been reduced.

Technical

76/100

Fundamentals

50/100

Betting

80/100

Prediction market

94/100

Sentiment

0/100

Top positive drivers

  • · crowd signal favours away (66.6 pp above uniform)
  • · market signal favours away (31.4 pp above uniform)
  • · learned signal favours away (31.2 pp above uniform)
  • · technical signal favours away (23.4 pp above uniform)

Top risk drivers

  • · Source conflict: technical vs crowd disagree (conflict score 100)

Missing: external prediction sites · NLP intel (news-derived signals)

Learned model

In blend

The learned model contributes to the public ensemble blend, alongside ratings, market signals and news intelligence. Performance is validated against an Elo baseline.

HAI 5%Draw 30%SCO 65%

Haiti win

5.4%

Draw

30.0%

Scotland win

64.5%

Total goals (λ)

2.50

Model confidence

47/100

Logistic regression model — version wdl-v1, trained on 19k historical internationals.

Article intelligence

Recent news, injury alerts and sentiment extracted by the NLP layer.

Scotland

30 articles / 14d

Sentiment 39
Morale 0
Net signal lean (home minus away): 0 · confidence 0%

Goals markets

BTTS yes

50.1%

Over 1.5

73.9%

Over 2.5

51.6%

Over 3.5

29.5%

Under 2.5

48.4%

Market intelligence

Mild divergence

Model probability

15.3%

Market probability

13.9%

Gap: +9.7 percentage points.

Market confidence: 96/100 across 44 bookmakers.

Odds shown for analysis only — CupCastLab does not place bets, list bookmakers, or recommend wagers.

Explanation

Why the model sees the match this way.

Model prediction: Scotland 57% to win, 23% for Haiti, 20% draw. Expected goals: Scotland 1.74 vs Haiti 1.00. Projected scoreline 0-1 (top exact at 13.2%). Goal environment moderate (BTTS 50%, Over 2.5 52%). Favorite multi-goal edge. Primary factor: overall strength difference is the dominant driver. Confidence: 54/100. Moderate confidence; outcome is meaningfully uncertain.

Factor contributions

HaitiFactorScotland
Overall strength
Recent form
Attack/defense balance
Expected-goals proxy
Squad depth
Injuries & suspensions
Travel, rest & weather
Tactical matchup
Tournament experience
Market calibration

Risk factors

  • No notable risk factors identified.

Uncertainty factors

  • No major uncertainty flags.

Tactical read

No standout tactical mismatch — the stylistic edge is modest.

Upset risk

Moderate upset risk — the underdog has identifiable paths to a result.

Market divergence

Model and market are in close agreement.

These predictions are probabilistic and not guarantees. Not betting advice.